This is my story with the professional donkeys at cafcass…

The case worker/Independent Adjuror
Cafcass Customer Services
Millburn Hill Road
University of Warwick Science Park
Coventry CV47JJ

15/12/19

Dear Sir/Madam,

THE COURT CASE NO…. CAFCASS ECMS NO ….

This letter is written with a view to requesting for an impartial investigation into the case appearing in the above caption. All necessary documents relating to the action taken by the so-called professionals of Cafcass which resulted in deprivation of my basic human rights. It is with utter disappointment I place on record that they arrived at a pre-conclusion (I am still at a loss to understand the grounds on which they did so) that I was a criminal and deprived of my right to see my sons for a couple of years. I have been discriminated by the said officials by not allowing me to see my sons whereas even some jailed parents with a history of child abuse too were allowed to do so in the prison.
May I ask you the reason as to how such a discriminatory action was resorted to by the state officials abusing their authority?
Further, I trust that I am entitled to make myself aware of about the manner on how Ms. Joann Clarke and her colleagues of Cafcass arrived at an unreasonable and unjustifiable conclusion that I was guilty of the charges framed against me (having no proven allegations to be resorted to such a harsh decision). The matter further aggravates when the said officials were strictly sticking to their opinion that I was guilty even subsequent to the false allegations being withdrawn by my ex-wife before the court trial.

As far as I know, the only allegation that was made use of by my opponents was the incident in which a fan was thrown across the room by me and my eldest son having got scared ran out of the room. Unfortunately, the biased reports prepared by the officials of Cafcass based on the aforesaid trivial incident, were made use by my ex-wife and her family to their advantage with a view to taking revenge on me and depriving me of my right to see my sons for a couple of years.

The case in question began with a simple request made by my ex-wife to get a Children Arrangement Order from the court in Sri Lanka on (State the date). (Evidence 02). The motive of this action was to honor the promise made by her to the Family Court in Sri lanka. Contrary to the legal system that prevails in the UK, family disputes are settled by the police in Sri Lanka. However, upon realization that there was a possibility of her being prosecuted and charged with jail terms if the authorities would find that she attempted to mislead them.
(The false allegations made against me by her in Sri Lanka were totally different from those made by her in the UK. (Evidence 03). As such, she decided to withdraw the case and return to the UK (State the date) (Evidence 04).
To my advantage, the Sri Lankan authorities were wise enough not to accept all allegations as being true from the inception and therefore scrutinized all facts relating to the charges. Ultimately, they even decided to give evidence against her too.

Subsequent to the lapse of a couple of weeks having sent me the proposed Arrangement Order ( Evidence 02 ) by my ex-wife, a fresh list of false allegations was furnished against me by her suddenly changing her mind.
(As far as I believe, the reason for her sudden change of attitude was due to the pressure put on her by her family.) I suppose in the meantime, she needed somebody from Cafcass to believe all her lies. Further, she had acquired a wide range of experiences by serving as a Library Assistant in the London borough of Haringey to make Cafcass officials believe what she said were true. My ex-wife was successful in her game when she managed to get Ms. Joan Clarke, the Cafcass Case Worker, to believe her false allegations and thereby to fight against me on behalf of her right through the case. Based only on the facts provided to her by my ex wife Ms. Clarke, without being impartial,arrived at a pre-conclusion that I was entirely at fault.

A dossier containing all relevant documents relating to the proceedings of the identical case heard by the court in Sri Lanka was prepared and submitted to Ms. Clarke before the first scheduled meeting I had with her in Stevenage. (Evidence 4,5). However, regardless of the aforementioned dossier I was alarmed that I would not get justice from Ms. Clarke through her attitude towards me based on a pre-conclusion that I was guilty, during the very first telephone conversation.

During the meeting, Mrs. Clarke emphasized that she believed all facts furnished by my ex wife without any doubt and with such a mindset she asked me confrontational questions based on the (false) written allegations only. It was salient that no question was asked of me by her with a view to providing me with an opportunity to reveal facts for my defense. Responding to my question with regard to the proposed Arrangement Order, she stated that it was an oversight and what happened in Sri Lanka had nothing to do with their decisions. (Evidence 02). She gave me an undertaking that all professional support needed in the legal proceeding of my case in the UK would be extended to me by her being a professional in the sphere.

In contrast to what was promised to me, the evaluation furnished by her with regard to the total case was not on par with reasonable principles of the law. As such, I was thoroughly disappointed and was at a lost to understand as to how a responsible official of the capacity of Ms. Clarke acts against basic human ethics with discrimination. When I asked her as to whether she scrutinized the contents of the dossier, she told me in the affirmative which I do not believe due to the following reason. I have no doubt had she gone through the contents of the dossier I submitted her well in advance prior to our first meeting intently without an ex-parte pre-conclusion that I was at fault, she would not have discriminated against me in the above manner.
(Evidence 05)

Ms. Clarke openly supported my ex-wife in contrast to the fact that a responsible official having authority should not be partial. It was evident from the inception of the proceedings in the court. When an order for a Supported Contact with my sons at a Contact Center was issued with by the court Ms. Clarke changed such order as per the wish of my ex-wife to a Supervised Order on her own at least without intimating either my solicitor or myself.
(Evidence 06).

By doing so, my ex-wife wanted to put my sons under pressure. Since she could not get such an order directly from the court, she managed to get the same through her new friend of Cafcass, Ms. Joan Clarke. During my contact sessions with my sons at the Purple Contact Center, there was nobody to support me in resolving the difficulties I faced right through. The reason was that the officials attached to the Purple Contact Center also got on the side of Ms. Clarke and on her influence I was looked down upon as a culprit and was maltreated like one by them. They were determined to discriminate against me and took all possible steps to create a bad picture of me through their reports too. They even altered the reports thrice in response to my vehement objections to the inaccurate reports prepared relating to the Contact Sessions.
(Evidence 07).

It is with great disappointment I place on record the biased attitude of Ms. Clarke by not supporting me to improve the situation. On one occasion a very young girl who was assigned by the Purple Contact Center to observe my meeting with my sons (having no reason to accuse me of) made a comment on her report that the manner in which I placed a slab of chocolate on the table had scared my sons. I am aware of that all such things happened on the instructions of Ms. Clarke to tarnish my character and to make a bad impression of me to the judge. Subsequent to the period of contact sessions at the Purple Contact Centre being lapsed, a partial report justifying the manner in which she handled the case was written by Ms. Clarke to be submitted to the court.

It is with utter dismay that I place on record the unethical manner in which a so called responsible official like Ms. Clarke resorted to discriminating against an accused of a case with a view to supporting the plaintiff of the same case. She left no stone unturned to bring discredit to me by abusing her official authority.

As such, she tried to emphasize the fact that my sons did not like either to see me or to keep an acquaintance with me. For this purpose, Ms. Clarke stepped down so low and reported once that I had compelled my youngest son to eat his own pooh. What an utter shame! (Yet, she could not prove her allegation against me.) When the trial started to proceed my ex-wife dropped all the false allegations against me at the eleventh hour.

She accepted only a single trivial incident which took place among her and our sons ever since they lived entirely with me in the UK and Sri Lanka. (Evidence O4). The reason which paved my ex-wife to resort to dropping all false allegations for the second time was that she was well aware of the fact that she could not depend totally on them. She also knew that I had sufficient facts to prove such allegations were only fabricated lies.

Though I had all chances to challenge her having proceeded with the case I did not do so as I could not stand her being humiliated in the court publicly. Further, no matter how aggressive the differences of opinions between us are, she is the mother of my children. I strongly believe that she should possess a strong character to care for the children without my assistance. Once the trial was concluded Ms. Clarke approached me and apologized to me.

To my disadvantage, it did not occur to me to record the conversation she had with me at that time. When the contact sessions moved to the Contact Intervention Centre, the attitude Ms. Clarke had not changed for some reason. Ms. Clarke along with Ms. Dawn Brook assured me that they would take all possible steps to alleviate the negative attitude my sons had towards me due to misunderstanding. Yet, they never intimated to me that reports would be written by them with regard to the contact sessions.

They further promised me that there would only be outside contact sessions and they would extend every support to make my sons better understand about the situation they faced. I wish to place on record my utter disappointment about the manner in which the officials in the Purple Contact Centre treated me. My involvement was never sought by them with a view to facilitating improvement of my relationship with my sons. They did not have any discussion or communication with me to that effect. Instead, they were eagerly waiting to find faults in me during the contact sessions and to report the same to the authorities.

Things being so, once I went to the extent of telling them that I did not mind to meet my sons with handcuffs so that I could talk to them freely and at ease of mind. I was compelled to say so due to the obnoxious treatment I was given by the Contact Intervention Centre. Though many letters were written to them on several occasions by me none of them were responded to by them. Further, they never supported me in any manner and neither a session of one hour or two hours were conducted by them with my participation. (The supervisor met me after the lapse of fifteen minutes stating that he had to talk to my sons and spent only fifteen minutes talking to me.) Ultimately, all the maltreatments I received from the above officials of Cafcass compelled me to come to the conclusion that they were determined to obstruct my meeting with my sons, irrespective of all efforts exerted by me. I was helpless in the presence of inhuman officials who deliberately victimized me by abusing their powers. As such, I did not have any alternative but to bear with all such un just with a heavy heart.


Dear Sir/Madam, The reason as to why I decided to appeal against the recommendations of Cafcass preventing me from contacting my sons for two years is to pave the way for them to state the truth one day in the future when they are mature enough to do so. By doing so, I am confident that they will not live the rest of their life with guilt. Otherwise they might even take revenge on their mother with such guilt. On the other hand, in the event my ex-wife decides to confess the manner on how she managed to mislead the officials of Cafcass and other authorities, it will be a relief for my sons to forgive her in the future. My obnoxious experiences with the officials of Cafcass and their co-workers

1. The responsible higher officials have not taken steps to make their representatives (the note takers, supervisors and other officials involved in my case) aware of my case.

2. The above officials were under the impression that I was a culprit who was released from jail recently and the court had imposed strict conditions for me to associate with my sons.

3. None of the note takers and the supervisors recorded the sessions promptly and prepared the relevant reports as they wished arbitrarily with no reasonable hearing. I was never allowed to raise objections to the contents of the inaccurate and biased reports which were unfavorable to me.

4. It is with utter disappointment that I noted the physical impairments such as eye sight, hearing, and concentration suffered by some of the note takers and supervisors who were entrusted with such a responsible duty, leaving me room for doubt about the accuracy of their reports.

5. The rooms allocated for contact sessions lacked proper ventilation, light and the suitable environment to converse at ease of mind. (This was one of the reasons why my sons did not like to get along with me for a long time.)

6. On some occasions, my paid contact sessions were used by the authorities in the Contract Centers for teaching their trainees.

7. Most of the so-called officials were not professionally qualified to hold their positions and lacked knowledge in dealing with the inmates and the visitors. I am under the impression that they get paid for nothing.

8. They did not communicate with either my solicitor or me in the proper manner. We were never sent any relevant documents causing us great inconvenience. As such, we had to seek assistance from a third party to make ourselves aware of the current development of my case. It was a deliberate practice of Ms. Clarke and Ms. Marina Douglas not to submit such reports before the trial. Instead, they always made it a point to submit those reports only subsequent to the hearing dates.

9. They did not have a mechanism or common sense to evaluate the situation and the facts. As such, they had to depend on the tools of Cafcass which were mainly designed to deal with people with problems and were not meant for those who attempted to prove their innocence genuinely.

10. As far as I am concerned, I am under the impression that both the organizations are involved in frauds relating to income tax. I not only accuse them with the above allegations but will also persecute them if they fail to furnish me with the invoices involved in the payments I made in respect of my matter. I humbly appeal to your good selves Sir/Madams to conduct an unbiased inquiry into the aforesaid allegations against them. You may call for explanations from the following officials and the organizations involved in my case with regard to the same for which I will provide you with sufficient proof.

Ms. Joan Clarke

1. The grounds on which she believed fabricated stories and false allegations made by Mrs. H. Wickramasinghe, my ex-wife against me.
(Evidence 08)

2. The reason why she decided to overlook the proposed Arrangement Order.
(Evidence 02).

3. The reason for her not responding to any of my emails.
(Evidence 09)

4. The reason for her to ask me only the confrontational questions during the first one to one meeting with me.

5. The reason for misleading me about changing the Supported Contact Order to Supervised Contact Order.

When questioned about the reason for her decision to change the court order from Supported Contact to Supervised Contact Session she told me that the judge was not aware of the ongoing abduction allegations in Sri Lanka. As such, she contacted the Sri Lankan Police authorities and got confirmed about the alleged incident. Further, the report of the specialist doctor form Sri Lanka made her to change the court order from Supported Contact to Supervised Contact Order. Since I have no doubt that she lied to me, I demand her to produce evidence with regard to the following facts.

i. The police station which she contacted in that respect.

ii. A copy of the specialist issued in respect of the mental status of my children.

6. The reason for her to ignore the explanation given by me in relation to the incident with the First Supported Contact Session.
(Evidence 08)

7. Whether she could produce the paperwork she submitted to the court with regard to the change of the court order.(A question arises as to why I should go to the court and spend a huge sum of money amounting to (£20000) if an official of her capacity could meddle with a crucial court order and change it in favor of the party acquainted with her.)

8. The reason for her to look down upon a court order given by Sri Lanka.
(Evidence 04)

9. The reason for her to mislead me by lying with regard to the Contact Intervention Center. (The main duty of her and her co-workers was to assist me and were not supposed to exercise discrimination whilst submitting contact reports which they did unethically.)

10. The reason for her to have close acquaintance with my ex-wife and right through the proceedings and until she had written her report.

11. The reason for her not to ask a single positive question from my children about me, being their father the act of which did not help change the attitude they had towards me.
(Evidence 10)

12. The reason for her not to contact persons whose names were furnished to her by me prior to her visit to my children.
(Evidence 11)

13. The reason why she deliberately ignored my caution about my ex-wife’s shrewdness to deceive the officials of Cafcass once again with her past experience.
(Evidence 09)

14. Whether she could satisfy herself conscientiously to the effect that she had written an impartial and fair report on me without abusing the power vested on her.

15. Would she agree with me if I were to suggest that her report was not completely genuine and was full of fabricated and false allegations with no proof whatsoever. If she recollected, how she responded red faced when my ex-wife dropped all false allegations against me in the court, in her presence. Subsequently, she came to me and apologized to me and promised me that she would extend me her fullest support. Everything my children told you about the case was when they were taught to state by my ex-wife with a view to misleading the Cafcass officials including her. 16. If she could recollect the number of occasions during which I told her whatever my children stated against me were fabricated and they were compelled by her to do so for the purpose of getting her report in favor of my ex-wife. The officer who interviewed my ex-wife at an interrogation office was an expert in people’s behavior. With his experience of years imparted his expertise to judge whether a person speaks the truth or not. Yet, I do not believe that Ms. Clarke possessed such an expertise to come to the conclusion to that effect.

17. The reason for her not to change the Contact Sessions to Independent Contact Sessions once she had learnt that all allegations against me were false.

18. Being a responsible official of Cafcass, whether she has ever been trained with Cafcass tools to detect or identify if the complaints, allegations or accusations were genuine when adults or children made them.

19. Whether my children have ever written letters to submit to the judge in her presence.

20. The reason for sending me her reports only after the court hearing date.

She being a highly professional authority in Cafcass I hope Ms. Clarke should be in a position to respond to all above queries with evidence in proof. If she fails to meet the above requirement it is salient that she is not professionally qualified to hold her position to resolve family matters any further. The points raised by me above bear witness to her erroneous judgment of facts especially with regard to the manner in which her response to the false allegations of my ex-wife against me. Had the conversations you had with me recorded by me right through the proceedings I would have easily proved how wrong she was when making decisions. In a nutshell, if she fails to provide with satisfactory answers to all above queries you will certainly have no doubt that the reports she had written in my case were not accurate and therefore should be disregarded. Sir, Madams, I am helpless since I find it very difficult to prove my innocence. I have never mistreated or abused my children as alleged. Though they know the truth they do not disclose facts relating to same as they do not wish to go against the instructions of their mother. As such, they try to keep away from me as much as possible. (it’s a pity that none of those who mediate my problem do not understand the reality. I am at a loss to understand as to whether such officials are really so ignorant to understand it or keep blind folded and dumbfounded with a view to favoring my ex-wife due to her influence.) I am surprised to see that so called professionals attached to an organization like Cafcass have been taken for a ride by a single lady, my ex-wife using her well trained tricks. Being the husband of her having spent a matrimonial life for more than fifteen years, I know the talent she possesses to achieve her goals by hook or by crook. Individuals who fall for her yarns do not understand that they are being hypnotized by her to get what she wants to get done with her womanly tricks. All efforts exerted by me to explain the same on innumerous occasions were in vain as they all were under the impression that I was at Fault.

Yet, in contrast, my ex-wife could not mislead the officer-in-charge of my case in Sri Lanka. She was an ex-terrorist interrogation officer and was well trained to detect any genuine attempts made by the suspects. On scrutiny of the facts and subsequent to being evaluated, the above officer concluded that my ex-wife did not act in bona fide. Accordingly, she dropped all the charges alleged by my ex-wife. Even at that I expected her to contact the said official in Sri Lanka and get all doubts cleared therein. To my disappointment, she did not do so telling me that she was a professional and knew how the necessary decision to be made.

She made all possible attempts to prevent my meeting with the children by disconcerting the facts on her report. She went to the extent of creating a picture on her report that I might harm my children during the meetings. Because of her reports based on biased and discriminatory decisions my sons will have to grow up without paternalistic love. My question is that whether Ms. Clarke shall take the responsibility for the damage that will because of their personality development. In the good old days when our family ties were intact, my children used to enjoy their life at their best. They were associating with the children of our family friends in the UK. As a result of your perseverance to sabotage the bond among my children and myself, their freedom is confined and thereby deprived them of their right to have interaction with our family friends and their children. It was the wish of my ex-wife to prevent my children having association with them and Ms. Clarke was used by my ex-wife as a cat’s paw to achieve such a nasty objective.

Now my ex-wife cannot face our family friends conscientiously as they all know the real picture. Therefore, she takes all attempts to stop my sons from having association with them.
Through the shrewdness of the attorneys with expertise truth is made false and innocent people get jail terms whereas the real culprits may get away with the mediation of law professionals. I hope my children will be in a better position to understand the reality when they grow up in the years to come. Then they will also be able to make their own decisions with a mature mindset. I hope to let them pursue this report with which I now challenge your organization as I have been treated unjustly by it. I am certain they will change the attitude with which they look at me today subsequent to these facts having been read carefully.

With this document which will be made public I wish to caution all citizens in the UK with regard to dealing with organizations like yours to be extra vigilant. A special request shall be made from them to keep audio, video and documentary proof of all matters connected with the Cafcass and other institutes meant for resolving family issues. My intention by doing so is to prepare those who will seek assistance of those institutes to challenge partiality, discrimination, abusing official authority. Purple Contact Centre

1. Whether the officials concern can produce the report they sent to Ms. Joan Clarke with regard to my first Supported Contact Session with my children?

2. The reason why they asked opinions of my ex-wife prior to being appointed the note takers for Contact Sessions.

3. The reason why they kept changing the note takers.

4. The reason why they decided to hide the incident report from me.
(Evidence 13)

5. The reason why they did not send me a copy of the Incident Report which they sent to my wife.
(Evidence 13)

6. May I ask you to reveal the qualifications of the following note takers to be on par with their responsibility.

i. Ms. Julia Keane
ii. Ms. Alisha Marcus
iii. Ms. Safina Mahamood
iv. Ms. Arina Patten

7. The reason for handing over the payment receipts without your official stamp.
(Evidence 14)

8. The reason for making alterations in the same Contact Session Report for 4 times.
(Evidence 7)

9. The reason for not responding to any of my emails.
(Evidence 15)

11. The reason for delaying my Contact Notes regularly and after the deadline of the court. I suggest that yours being a responsible institute having prestige does not conform to the norms laid down for showing its transparency, especially as far as financial matters are concerned. I dare say so through my own experience. Further, I have evidence to prove to that effect. I am at a loss to understand as to why the proper receipts for the payments made by me in respect of the Contact Sessions were not given to me by the Purple Contact Centre.

The ones I was given were just like receipts used by the cheap boutiques which cannot be produced for any official purposes since they do not look formal. Please be good enough to provide me with the Registration Number of your organization and the professional body under which it was registered for the purpose of taking this matter up. I wish to place on record for the relevant officials to make themselves aware of that though I had made this request several times over the phone and via emails from the Purple Contact Centre such requests of mine have not been acceded to-date.

Contact Intervention Centre (Bold Move) 1. The grounds on which Mr. Lee Cooper was appointed as the Contact Session Supervisor. Mr. Lee Cooper told me that he had a very bad relationship with his father and hated him too. It is my opinion that a person having a grudge with his own father is not suitable to be entrusted to mediate with a sensitive case like mine?

2. What qualification Mr. Cooper possessed the position of Session Supervisor?

3. The reason why Mr. Cooper had always sworn at me?

4. The reason for him to disgrace me by asking me unnecessary questions like as to whether I was in jail?

5. The reason why Mr. Cooper was so concerned about making me apologize to my children and kept asking so all the time?

6. On whose influence or necessity that Mr. Cooper kept changing the venue by lying to me?

7. What sort of assistance Mr. Cooper and the Contact Intervention Team offered me. The proof they have to establish their facts?

8. The reason why they promised me to assist with a parental programme and did not keep such a promise?

9. The reason for Ms. Clair, one of their note takers to accompany Ms. Nicola, the trainee with her and on how she managed to get a very bad report on me in less than 20 minutes. Although the particular session was set-up by Mr. Cooper did not want to conduct the same and instead he assigned a lady with tattoos and her trainee to do the same. The duration of the session was only 20 minutes. When I inquired about the trainee she did not want to respond and showed her displeasure. Further, I showed her a video clip of my children once they had left the building. It seemed to me that she did not know anything about my children and myself at all. The worst part of it was that she did not even know the charges of the session she conducted. It was observed by me she was talking to her trainee during the entire session taking no interest in the duty entrusted to her. Above all, irrespective of all her lapses and negligence of her duties having no reasonable facts, ultimately she prepared the worst report on me. She even went to the extent of recommending the conclusion of the facility of meeting my children. It was with her so-called report that the attorney representing my ex-wife took an attempt to prove that the contact session did not produce the anticipated outcome.

10. The reason as to why they did not reply to any of the emails I sent to them?
(Evidence 17)

11. The grounds on which Mr. Cooper arrived at the conclusion the poems which were composed by me were inappropriate? (Evidence 16)

12. The grounds on which Mr. Cooper decided to effect changes to the duration of the sessions which were originally from 1 hour to 2 hours to that of 2 hours to 1 hour?

Ms. Maria Douglas 1. Whether she conscientiously believed the report she wrote on me was based on facts evaluated reasonably and without prejudice.

2. The reason for exclusion of all facts and incidents and particulars which were in my favor.

3. What proof she had to justify my phone courtesy as alleged in her report.

4. The reason for her not to respond to any of my emails.
(Evidence 19)

5. Whether she conscientiously accepts that she acted on the pre-conclusion that I was at fault only on facts revealed to her by my ex-wife.

6. The reason for her not to contact the individuals mentioned in the list I handed over to her before preparing her report.
(Evidence 11)

7. The reason for her refusal to meet me in person for the final meeting depriving me of my right to reveal facts which would have stood in my favor.

8. Whether she accepts that Cafcass arrived at a pre-conclusion that I was at fault based on the justification made of only the facts revealed by my ex-wire, ex-parte.

9. She believes that my ex-wife, irrespective of all differences of opinion, extended her fullest support to let my children have acquaintance with me.

10. The time at which I was advised by her to opt for a Parental Programme.

11. The reason for her not to show any interest when I informed her that the above program was organized by the Contact Intervention Center.

12. The role of the Parental Program and the organization which conducts such programs.

13. The reason and the grounds for which the false allegation on domestic abuse was included in her report even subsequent to being accepted. Those allegations were false by her during the telephone conversation she had with me.

14. Whether my children wrote any letter to submit the judge in her presence.

15. Whether she possesses the competency having ever been trained by Cafcass so called tool to trace or identify if the complaints, stories or accusations made by children or adults are not fabricated.

16. Whether it was reasonable to state in her report without sufficient facts that my ex-wife was extremely sad to see my inability to note the damage I caused to their well-being. Not so far in the future, my children will become mature enough to distinguish between right and wrong . Then one day, they will reveal to the world what actually took place inside No. 18 Almacut, AL11QB where she had a cup of tea and a very friendly conversation with my exwife.I eagerly await the day on which my children will make their mother confess on her attempts to mislead the officials and their co-workers of Cafcass to get them to discriminate me and to prepare reports in her favor. Because the truth cannot be buried and anyhow it will surface one day irrespective of all the efforts exerted to hide same.On conclusion, I wish to place on record that the conversation she had me during the interview was recorded and is in possession with me to produce as a proof in the course of legal proceedings in the future.

15 of June 2023

Dear Sir/Madam,

The intention of submitting this report to your good selves is to get justice done to me by an impartial investigation held into the unreasonable, unjustifiable and unethical behavior of a staff of officials attached to the highly responsible institutions of state service. I, being a father with sense, do not wish to see my children in mental agony and therefore do not ever wish to harm them physically or mentally. Now that I am treated unfairly by the law enforcement authorities based on the partial reports submitted by the officials of Cafcass and many other institutions involved in the process. I am helpless among many of the law enforcing institutions and their support entities which favor my ex-wife having been misled by her using her shrewdness.

I know the truth cannot be suppressed and like oil it will surface one day. I have no other alternative but to wait and let the time do just for me. I am anxiously waiting till that day to be the father of my children and to reunite with them saying goodbye to the aching past. I have nothing against my ex-wife and in fact I feel sorry for her. She was in a tight corner and their family members compelled her to act according to their wish. She had no alternative but to dance to their tune with a view to appeasing them. As such I will never look down upon her in the presence of my children. They like all children, need both their parents to face society with confidence.

My effort in writing this report as a helping tool for them to understand that I, being their father, have never left them in the lurch and have fought to be with them intact. I will always be there to extend my fullest support to my children at their hour of need.

I am prepared to face an interview with you Sir, at any time in the event you feel so to scrutinize all evidences prior to come to a fair, reasonable and justifiable conclusion as to whether I am guilty or not to the allegations made against me by my ex-wife and all other relevant officials of Cafcass and other institutions.

All relevant emails and correspondence I had with the Cafcass officials and their co-workers can be submitted to you if required via email.

I wish to face myself for a lie detector test and submit the report and to bear the charges that will incur in respect of the same test on behalf of my ex-wife too. Further, I am also prepared to pay for the specialist service in the event my children will be sent to determine if they were told to lie to others and if they are speaking the truth.
I will be much obliged to you if you could take necessary steps to pave the way for my children to recommence acquaintance with their Sri Lankan friends in the UK too. You may contact me 07448888769 or via email tharaka@hotmail.co.uk.

Finally, I hope you will be reasonable enough to give ear to my predicament. The most important correspondence relating to the same were submitted to you for your kind perusal. I hope you will make a fair, reasonable, justifiable and unbiased decision with regard to my case and redress me with just.

Thank you,

Yours very truly,

Tharaka Kalubovila

Unfortunately I did not hear or get a reply from them to the date 02/02/24.